Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b)

Download scientific diagram | Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b) κ = 0 . 18, (c) κ = 0 . 30. We pick the second as the resultant model because of its good compatibility between weighted mis fi t and solution roughness. The numbers between the triangles in (a) indicate the segments. The white star denotes the epicenter from Harvard CMT solution.  from publication: 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery | Imagery, Imagery (Psychotherapy) and Earthquake | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

Applied Sciences, Free Full-Text

In situ characterisation of the strain fields of intragranular slip bands in ferrite by high-resolution electron backscatter diffraction - ScienceDirect

Frontiers Study on earthquake and tsunami hazard: evaluating probabilistic seismic hazard function (PSHF) and potential tsunami height simulation in the coastal cities of Sumatra Island

3D monitoring of the surface slippage effect on micro-particle sedimentation by digital holographic microscopy

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

Remote Sensing, Free Full-Text

Frontiers InSAR coseismic deformation field and seismogenic structure of the 2020 Mw6.0 Jiashi earthquake and the implication for the moderate-magnitude seismicity in the southwestern Tian Shan, western China

Effect of grain size on critical twinning stress and work hardening behavior in the equiatomic CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloy - ScienceDirect

Determination of the optimal dip angles and the preferred smoothing

Aseismic slip and recent ruptures of persistent asperities along the Alaska-Aleutian subduction zone

A series of inversion results, as well as the corresponding trade-off

Simulation result of single error factor for amplitude ΔB(k): (a) Phase